Hi!

Am Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2017 schrieb Olaf Meeuwissen:
> Hi,
> 
> Dr. Nikolaus Klepp writes:
> 
> > Hi Ralph!
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017 schrieb Ralph Ronnquist:
> >> Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote on 05/12/17 18:41:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > On 2017-11-29 08:37, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp wrote:
> >> >> Hi!
> >> >>
> >> >> Am Mittwoch, 29. November 2017 schrieb Didier Kryn:
> >> >>> Le 29/11/2017 à 08:38, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp a écrit :
> >> >>>> Hi!
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> When bootin ascii and eth0 is present and configured as dhcp and eth0 
> >> >>>> is not connected to a network, then the boot process is blocked at ~ 
> >> >>>> 1 minute at the stage where eth0 is configured. This is quite anoying 
> >> >>>> and did not happen on jessie. Is there an easy way to get the old 
> >> >>>> behaviour (i.e. background dhcp request) back on ascii?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>      Sorry to reply by this triviality: did you check
> >> >>> /etc/network/interfaces ?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>      If you have 'auto eth0' , then it might explain the wait.
> >> >>>      Normally, if the cable is meant to be unplugged/replugged, you
> >> >>> should have
> >> >>>      'allow-hotplug eth0' instead.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>      Didier
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, this is exactly the problem: I have these lines in 
> >> >> /etc/network/interfaces:
> >> >>
> >> >> allow-hotplug eth0
> >> >> iface eth0 inet dhcp
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Maybe I did not make myself clear:
> >> >
> >> > No matter which line I put in /etc/network/interfaces, be it 
> >> > "allow-hotplug eth0" or "auto eth0", booting is delayed when no network 
> >> > is present and dhcp should be used.
> >> >
> >> > Could somebody else please check if this is behavior is reproducible?
> >>
> >> Both of those result in "ifup eth0" being run as part of the boot
> >> sequence, and a wait for that to succeed or give up. Neither scheme pays
> >> attention to the link state; it merely checks whether the interface is
> >> up or not, and if not, it brings it up bmo ifup.
> >>
> >> I believe that during some period in the past, the control scripts
> >> involved (nowadays /etc/init.d/networking or /lib/udev/net.agent) did
> >> pay attention to link state, and avoided the ifup command when the link
> >> wasn't there, which then avoided it waiting for dhcp to give up. But I
> >> might remember it wrong; in any case, progress has made it that today we
> >> wait, or bypass it by using some other networking solution.
> >>
> >> Ralph.
> >
> > Ok, then this is really stupid and a regression. Jessie did check if the 
> > cable is plugged in and did only run dhcpcd when the cable was present. 
> > Acsii does not check and so blocks on every system startup for ~ 1 minute. 
> > When ascii becomes stable this will most likely make a bunch of people quit 
> > unhappy :-/
> 
> I've been afflicted by the same :-(
> 
> > Just seen in the manpage:
> >
> > (Interfaces marked "allow-hotplug" are brought up when udev detects them.  
> > This can
> > either be during boot if the interface is  already  present,  or  at  a 
> > later  time,
> > for  example when plugging in a USB network card.  Please note that this 
> > does not
> > have anything to do with  detecting  a  network cable being plugged in.)
> >
> > Hm ... what to do about it? Any idea?
> 
> Downgrade to 0.8.13?  From the changelog for 0.8.14:
> 
>   * Ignore link state when bringing up hotplug interfaces at boot.
>     Closes: #814785, #834820

Now how sick is this? Break lan 'caus systemd cannot handle wlan propperly? Did 
nobody actually test what this "fix" does?

ascii has "ifupdown" version 0.8.19, no way back :-(

> 
> # Had a quick look and it *seems* udev is involved somehow ...
> 
> Revert the change that "fixes" those two Debian bugs?
> 
> Another option could be to muck around in /etc/init.d/networking to
> check whether *wired* "allow-hotplug" interfaces have a cable attached
> before trying to bring them up.
> 
> No bright ideas for how you'd check for that though, but it probably
> involves poking around in /sys/class/net/$IFACE/.
> 
> Hope this helps,



-- 
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with 
the NSA, CIA ...
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to