On 10/31/2017 10:07 AM, dev wrote:
I have some systemd encumbered systems and Devuan boot times beat them
hands down. The difference is so profound I can't believe anyone at
Redhat would even use that as a justification any more but they do
because nobody is going to argue with "we did it to make it faster".
Yeah, same here.
My systemd systems take 80+ seconds to boot up whereas my devuan system
is only 10 seconds.
There is always one reason or another for "a start job is running for -
network interfaces/disks/etc)" which halts the entire boot process
"faster", even without those it still is much slower than devuan.
SystemD is a power play in the linux community, maybe even a super
backdoor - why else would every distro suddenly adopt it despite it not
being an improvement over SysVinit.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
