Struggling with vendors that cater mostly for MS Windows users who don't really care about Secure Boot being disabled or not, is not the way that leads to an available solution. Such vendors are far too powerful to bow to the pressures of insignificant pressure groups like 'old fashioned' Linux users who do not want to use a 'modern distribution'. What I would do, is dedicate a small partition to hold a distribution that can actually boot in Secure Mode and I would use that to manage my bootloader.
You have the choice of at least two major distributions that work under Secure Boot. These are Ubuntu and Debian. This solution was what I did when GRUB 2 started to behave obstinately refusing to install its first stage when completely stripped of an operating system. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
