On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:12:51 +0200, Arnt wrote in message <20171022141252.7d06269c@d44>:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:14:24 +0200, Arnt wrote in message > <20171022121424.4755f92c@d44>: > > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:28:21 +0900, Olaf wrote in message > > <87vaj7etwv....@member.fsf.org>: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Arnt Karlsen writes: > > > > > > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 20:37:35 +0100, KatolaZ wrote in message > > > > <20171021193735.gg4...@katolaz.homeunix.net>: > > > > > > > >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 08:48:57PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > > >> > > > >> [cut] > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > We have been testing amprolla3 for more than two months > > > >> > > now, on dozens machines, and it has been working like a > > > >> > > charm. > > > >> > > > > >> > ..ok, with jessie + jessie-* + experimental too? > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> Yes. You don't need to use both packages.devuan.org and > > > >> pkgmaster.devuan.org. The former serves the packages merged by > > > >> the original amprolla. The latter served the repos merged by > > > >> amprolla3. So choose one of the two. > > > > > > > > ..done, 613 upgradeable, Obsolete & local dropped to 5 from 6k > > > > and Installed rose by 6k to 7380, so I guess we're headed the > > > > right way, I have e.g. pulseaudio wanting to upgrade from our > > > > 5.0-13+devuan2 to I suspect Debian's systemd'ed 7.1.2~bpo8+1, > > > > what else to look out for? > > > > > > I found the same. I'm on jessie with security, updates and > > > backports enabled. It turned out that all my upgradable packages > > > are from the backports suite. Slightly worrying is that a number > > > of these are for devuan-ized packages. The 'pulseaudio' package > > > you mentioned is one. Another that is probably trouble was > > > 'reportbug'. The other (source) packages I found were > > > bash-completions and cups. > > > > > > For non-devuan-ized packages, udev and rsyslog might be > > > problematic. > > > > > > Hope this helps, > > > > ..it does... dropping backports, the 613 upgradeables drops to 60, > > mostly kde's with fishy +deb8uX tails, sudo, dwww and linux-*-3.16, > > while linux-*-4.9, forensic-all et al, gnash, klash etc winds up as > > Obsolete and Locally Created Packages hiking it to 72 from 5, sooo, > > like Seth Meyers puts it: It's time for a closer look! > > ..dropping " -t experimental " from aptitude's cli will let it show > it's built package lists, showing no Upgradeable and no New packages > and "83 bsolete and Locally Created Packages." ..leaving "-t experimental" out while adding backports back in, I now have a credible "1 Upgradeable, linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.3-rt-amd64 version 4.9.30-2+deb9u5~bpo8+1" and still no New packages and a lowered "16 Obsolete and Locally Created Packages", vdev, d1h, apulse, the refracta's, setnet, linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-unsigned, dbus-tests, libjournal-shim and local stuff like companion22, brlcad and 2 alien epson printer packs. ..leaving "-t experimental" out of aptitude's cli while adding experimental back in into the sources list, I now have a more credible "4 Upgradeable", 3 broken (udisks2, libudev (and libudisks2)) and "10 New packages" and a credible "5 Obsolete and Locally Created Packages", linux-image-4.9.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64-unsigned, and local stuff like companion22, brlcad and 2 alien epson printer packs. ..now adding "-t experimental" back in to aptitude's cli, adds no new mayhem, the "10 New packages" above are db4.8-utils and depends etc. "This has been a closer look!" ;o) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
