> On Oct 16, 2017, at 11:18 AM, Dr. Nikolaus Klepp <dr.kl...@gmx.at> wrote:
> 
> Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2017 schrieb Tobias Hunger:
>> On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Didier Kryn <k...@in2p3.fr> wrote:
>>>    Then maybe I misunderstood the reason for EFI.
>> 
>> UEFI is a huge step forward in pretty much all areas and makes booting
>> both simpler and more powerful.

The Northern Virginia Linux Users Group (NoVALUG) had a great presentation on 
uEFI. [1]  It is two hours long, but it goes into the history of EFI (dating 
back to the mid-90s), the issues with BIOS, and the mechanics of booting with 
uEFI.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRGDXy65Plg

>> UEFI has a couple more features:
>> 
>> * UEFI allows for better hardware support (graphical login at full
>> resolution, mouse support, RAID drivers, etc.)
>> * UEFI allows for more security with secure boot. E.g. my thinkpad
>> *only* boots things that I have signed with my key.
>> * UEFI allows for different OSes living next to each other peacefully,
>> without the constant fight over who writes the MBR and with that
>> defines the boot loader.
> 
> You forgot to mention that UEFI is the best code in the world written by the 
> the best of the best and therefore absolutely secure.

Where is this coming from?  I don’t know of anyone who has ever said that, 
because there isn’t one uEFI implementation any more than there is one BIOS 
implementation.

Most uEFI implementations are not complete, instead they have just enough to 
get the particular machine running as shipped.  From time to time, uEFI 
implementations have serious bugs in them.  Both of these statements can be 
made about BIOS implementations, too.

The size of disks and the size of memory has far exceeded what 16-bit code can 
handle, which is how BIOS executes.  uEFI gets us away from the 
cylinder:head:sector layout, which hasn’t been valid for mechanical hard drives 
for decades (tracks have variable sector counts), let alone that no SSD has 
cylinders or heads.

The bullets Tobias has above are correct, although, technically, secureboot is 
built on top of uEFI, not as a part of it.

jf
-- 
John Franklin
frank...@tux.org



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to