The allegation is that customers receive a patch to GPL software and that the company makes it clear to the customers that this patch must not be redistributed.
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:30 PM, para...@dyne.org <para...@dyne.org> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Bruce Perens wrote: > > > I've been getting credible reports that [1]grsecurity.net is > > infringing the kernel by preventing customers from redistributing the > > GPL code for their patch. > > Can you provide proof? In no way are they violating the GPL. It might be > a question of moral and the "spirit" of free software, but the GPL (and > in case of the kernel it is GPL2) is not being violated by Grsecurity. > > > What is it we want Google to do? They usually listen when I ask... > > Stop funding wrong and incompetent people. > > -- > ~ parazyd > GPG: 0333 7671 FDE7 5BB6 A85E C91F B876 CB44 FA1B 0274 >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
