Alessandro: > On 18/04/2017 at 15:11, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > > Alessandro Selli: > > ... > >> And > >> what I don't like of Karl Aspo's idea is that it takes any instrument of > >> policy checking and enforcing out of the monitor, which ends up not > >> being able to monitor anything, it becomes just a shell: fire and forget. > > I honestly do not understand what I have written which gives you that idé. > Your many lines that the monitor is not to do any monitoring. Like: > "Why do any monitor program need to know if the program has detached or > not, the only thing it needs to know is the pid and the state,".
You cut out the thing after the "," which makes that a question for someone else to fill in the blanks, the things that's not obvious to me. If a process knows the pid of another process and have sufficient rights, can it not manage that process or is there anything else it needs to know, what am I missing ? Regards, /Karl Hammar ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Aspö Data Lilla Aspö 148 S-742 94 Östhammar Sweden +46 173 140 57 _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
