On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 02:59:13PM +0100, Giovanni Rapagnani wrote: > Hello everyone, >
[cut] > > Based on the MLs description on [2], devuan-discuss is the primary ML for > requesting help and discuss about Devuan. That is wrong! The fact is that > DNG is the primary ML for such things. > > devuan-discuss is not useful and causing troubles: newcomers don't get help; > community is splits into 2 groups; ML activity gives a bad perception about > Devuan project activity. Sorry, but I don't get your point. The request you are talking about was posted to devuan-discuss after 21:00 (CEST) on Saturday 5th November. It is now Sunday 6th November, 14:16 CEST, so 17 long (weekend) hours have passed since that email appeared on devuan-discuss. Believe it or not, people might actually have something better (or simply different) to do during the week-end than waiting in front of their email client to address problems found by other users. I understand nowadays this is hard to believe, but email is an inherently *asynchronous* and *non-istantanoeus* communication channel. My2Cents KatolaZ -- [ ~.,_ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - GLUGCT -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ "+. katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it ] [ @) http://kalos.mine.nu --- Devuan GNU + Linux User ] [ @@) http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia -- GPG: 0B5F062F ] [ (@@@) Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
