Quoting Simon Hobson (li...@thehobsons.co.uk): > And you've gone on to keep extrapolating that "that's all a library does".
No, that's all that _this_ library does. And, no, I did not 'extrapolate' anything. If you think so, you didn't read what I wrote correctly, and ought to fix that. libsystemd0's status as a bundle of interface code that does nothing in the absence of systemd is not because it's a library -- obviously -- but rather because all it _contains_ is interface code that does nothing in the absence of systemd -- according to people who keep an eye on such things, and also that's what it's documented to be. If you want to determine whether those people are correct or not, you're welcome to learn to read code and do likewise. Personally, I'm glad to rely on those who do. And, pending my getting the library off my system, I'm not going to waste time worrying about it any more than I waste time worrying about the Kerberos libraries. If _you_ wish to do so, on the other hand, feel free and have fun. I'm sorry you did not understand the phrase 'it's just a library' and erroneously overread that as a claim that libraries qua libraries cannot do anyting. Perhaps if you bothered to read some basic documentation, such as I recommended, you would not have encountered this problem. > I have not at any point disputed that that may be all it does now - > yes you persist in wording your replies in a manner which (whether > deliberate or not) implies that all such a library can do is > "nothing". I did not say, and would not say, that a libarary does nothing on grounds of it being a library. What is well established is that _this_ library is just interface code for systemd, and therefore does nothing in its absence because of the particular contents the library has. And I don't expect the Kerberos 5 libraries to suddenly start attacking my system because of the particular contents _they_ have. Either one _could_ be caused by a collaboration between evil upstream developers and evil distribution packagers to attack my system. But that's extremely low on my list of things to worry about. Your paranoia priorities differ? Great, have fun. > Now lets settle this once and for all, the thing is that this is > supposed to be about choice. I really don't care whether you are happy > or not having libsystemd0 on your system - that's your choice, based > on your priorities, policies, etc, etc. Are you talking to _me_ because you think I'm somehow in your way? If so, you are greatly in error, and I'd appreciate it if you would direct your rants at someone else who actually is in your way. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
