Am Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:30:36 +0000 schrieb Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com>:
> I'd prefer a display manager that isn't associated with a window > manager or desktop environment. I understand that and i would agree, but in my experience with devuan here, lxdm was the loginmanager which worked better (lightdm is an euphemism, i'd say, it is all but light). lxdm is really light, even not heavy compared to slim (which is lighter but not that much). I liked slim from my crunchbang experience but i'm afraid it is in somehow outdated - since it is not maintained since a while (have a look at the arch wiki about). (1) Just a, may be naive, question: shouldn't it be possible to free lxdm completely of any dependence of lxde? As far as i see lxde-common and desktop-base are suggestions, not needed. For what we may be afraid, the dependency of libdbus might be a problem ... (?) --- 1) If i'd be more talented linuxwise, i'd offer myself to create a nice configuration of wdm. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
