Hi, Steve Litt wrote: << Ignore doesn't mean insult. It doesn't mean get all sad. It means not respond, and don't let it get under your skin. And you need to understand that this list is neither a C list nor a Rapid Learning list, so you need to pick and choose only your best discoveries and questions for the list. Other questions are pretty easy via experimentation plus web searches. >>
"And you need to understand that this list is neither a C list". But it was this list that went into attack mode. Therefore, it made, and still makes sense, to show this thread what I am doing. "Ignore doesn't mean insult. It doesn't mean get all sad." Ignore means accepting the insult as the truth. That is the problem about that attitude. So, what I wrote, is an insult, while "cognitively deficient", more or less the same meaning as moron, imbecile, idiot, whatever, IS NOT?! Don't you see, this is an unfair evaluation? Why should anyone evaluate words according to who is saying them? Maybe, Joel Roth has a prominent position in the project, I don't know. In this little pebble of a country I live in, we have a saying that goes something like this: "It is not what you know, but who you know that counts!" In this list, whatever I do, I am always to blame. This is giving me the impression it is my name that is to blame, not what I did. Sorry for the capital letters, I KICKED BACK which should be normal in such circumstances, why are you expecting me to "turn the other cheek"? Sorry, the criticism I am receiving doesn't follow logically, notwithstanding I can do many things with a computer the majority of people consider only fit for gurus. My code repeatedly works reliably, and yet my most important intellectual capability, "reason", is lacking. Edward _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
