On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:14:57 +0100 Simon Hobson <li...@thehobsons.co.uk> wrote:
> Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: > > > Of all the escapades of FreeDesktop.Org, managers of Lennart and the > > Redhats, these name thingies are some of the least onerous. I put a > > shellscript on the list a few months ago that delivers the wifi > > device name, and that script can be used in init scripts and the > > like. > > > > I mean, by all means use it as a talking point, but if it's actually > > giving you trouble, look up my shellscript and use it. > > It's not giving me trouble, I'm still on Wheezy, and I use udev rules > to rename interfaces to meaningful names anyway. > > But, I get the impression you only run "simple" systems. The preceding is a fairly accurate statement, unless it refers to some of the user programs I run. > Once you > start having firewalls (interface names in config file(s)), > monitoring (interface names in config file(s)), data collection > (interface names in config file(s)), ... it stops being something > that you can "fix" with a script that will tell you what your > interface is called today. Good point. Here in my house, I trust everyone with a physical console, so individual computers have simple or no firewalls. My Internet firewall is pFSense, and every once in a while I use OpenBSD/pf instead: I long ago gave up dealing with iptables. AFAIK, those merry jesters from FreeDesktop.Org consider BSD not important enough to sabotage. SteveT Steve Litt June 2016 featured book: Troubleshooting: Why Bother? http://www.troubleshooters.com/twb _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng