Hi, I contest the idea that software has to be continuously developed. Eventually, proper development stop like what happens with a building. Then, maintenance follows. This means as long as software has bug fixes (maintenance), there would be no justified reason not to use it.
Edward On 29/05/2016, BohwaZ <dev...@bohwaz.net> wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:56:03 +0200 / Edward Bartolo <edb...@gmail.com> > said : > >> Hi, >> >> I am a user of SLIM. What is wrong with it? I read that it is not >> being actively developed. Does it mean a project has to be >> continuously developed to be used? Aren't bug reports and bug fixes >> NOT enough? > > I also use Slim, and it works well. But if something better exists (and > as light), why not, but for me I don't see why we should remove a > software just because it doesn't have a new version every two weeks, as > long as it works… > > I don't really care either about preserving the last chosen session, > and a better idea would be to propose a patch instead of requesting the > software removal. > > Cheers. > > -- bohwaz > _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
