On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:53:15PM +0200, Irrwahn wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 16:08:51 +0200, Irrwahn Grausewitz wrote:
> > I just filed an issue against the Devuan slim package, 
> > requesting its removal from future Devuan releases. 
> 
> Just to prevent possible misunderstandings, some 
> clarification re my stance on that: 
> 
> I would never object to Devuan becoming the new upstream 
> for SLiM!  IMO it would be nice to have a lightweight 
> graphical login manger available, especially for low 
> end hardware.

It would be fun for Devuan to become the upstream source for a Debian package.

-- hendrik

> 
> However, until somebody steps up and fixes the obvious 
> errors I propose to let it reside solely in unstable. 
> *If* it gets eventually fixed, it can go down the 
> designated path of being allowed to enter testing, and 
> eventually stable, once testing becomes the new stable.
> 
> BTW, fun fact, these are the versions of slim currently 
> in the Devuan repos:
> 
> testing:          1.3.6-5+devuan1
> stable, unstable: 1.3.6-5+devuan3
> 
> Anybody else notice something odd?  }:-P
>     
> Regards
> Urban
> _______________________________________________
> Dng mailing list
> Dng@lists.dyne.org
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to