On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:37:40AM +0200, Jaromil wrote: > > Personally and daydreaming, on the longlong term :^) I'd rather > appreciate an effort that ditches elisp alltogether, learning from the > goods and bads of Emacs, and builds something on a more modern LISP > interpreter like Guile2 or even better Clojure. I'm a big fan of the > latter actually, its a pity that most editors written in clj are > proprietary.
There is an editor written as part of the Racket version of Scheme. It's part of its development environment. I don't know how separable it is, -- hedrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
