Am Mon, 16 May 2016 13:41:14 +0000 schrieb dev <devua...@gmail.com>: > Very well spoken. Debian leadership has demonstrated it's disinterest > in remaining "Free". There is another motive driving Debian > development now and Systemd will end up being the core of Debian. To > remove it will only mean uninstalling the entirety of the distro > itself.
Please do not take my question wrong (probably i am missing something): If it's that way, how can devuan then rely on debian as for packages etc.? At least in a forseeable future ... ? I think i understand the nucleus of the problem of init choice but i am not a technician. And like many of you i found disgusting the manners they disputed about systemd or alternatives (it was horrible in arch and even more horrible in siduction. As i see it, the problem of the supporters of systemd is, structurally/logically, they cannot accept the idea of multiple init choices because it's contradictorial to the concept of systemd). Cheers. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
