YES NETMAN has been around as a standalone mainframe network/system automation product since at least the 90s on MVS/ESA, and later moved into workload manager under z/OS but it is still known and referred to as NETMAN. CA also has a product called NETMAN for mainframe systems, I suppose because IBM never trademarked it.
BOTH organizations are quite litigious, not to mention the confusion among a significant segment of the population as to which platform is in context. Plus, I never liked the name then. Sounds like pigman, or spiderman, or a guy who supplies fishing nets. SWS On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:18 AM, aitor_czr <aitor_...@gnuinos.org> wrote: > > On 02/04/2016 12:47 PM, Edward Bartolo <edb...@gmail.com> > <edb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > This mail thread is intended to collect votes regarding netman's name > change. The question is: > > Do you agree to renaming netman? > > The answers should be YES and NO. No long replies needed, I will > adhere to the outcome vote. > > The poll will be open until 11 February 2016. > > Edward > > > NO. > > 'Netmgr' already exists in Oracle. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
