On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 22:13:06 +0100 (CET), k...@aspodata.se wrote in message <20160104211307.20a5d809d...@turkos.aspodata.se>:
> Rainer Weikusat: > > k...@aspodata.se writes: > > > chaosesquet...@cock.li: > > >> I don't understand the desire to change it at all. > > > > > > And neither do I. > > > Except someone talked about ssl libs. > > > > Someone wrote about some PAM module which would require OpenSSL. No > > such PAM module currently exists on my system and I don't quite > > understand why 'PAM modules' would be needed for booting a system, > > anyway. > > > > But udev wants to put its rules files below /usr by default and as > > far as I know, changing this requires patching the code. > > Don't use udev so cannot check that. Perhaps time for devuan to > switch to vdev, is it ready for prime time ? > > Why don't udev place its rules close to the kernel modules directory, > that would make more sense, or put them under /etc as is the > conventional wisdom. But then, /etc-less systems are thought about: > > http://0pointer.net/blog/projects/stateless.html ...which is also © Lennart Poettering. Let them systemd guys prove us wrong in the _long_ run. ;o) ..in the short term, I'm pleasantly surprised to see more traffic here in devuan-* than in debian-user. ;oD -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
