On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 20:23:21 +0100
richard lucassen <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok, I think we agree. But as OP said: it would be very nice to get rid
> of initramfs. But for a distribution kernel this would be almost
> undoable. So what about the idea to just have an initrd containing all
> necessary modules for mounting / ? The rest can be loaded once the /
> fs has been mounted.

And of course, as suggested by Didier, build in a few popular
filesystems. In these cases an initrd can be omitted. That keeps things
simple IMHO.

R.

-- 
___________________________________________________________________
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak
aloud and remove all doubt.

+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Richard Lucassen, Utrecht                                        |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to