Sadly I must agree with you Linux O'Beardly. Maybe there's much money in play?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Linux O'Beardly <linux.obear...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies in advance for digressing, but it honestly amazes me how > ignorant and passive Linus and RMS have been about the whole systemd fiasco > since it's inception. Also, the one person that really astounded me at his > concession to systemd was Shuttleworth. I figured if anyone were going to > fight the fight, it would be him. I've never been so disappointed in a > visionary I previously admired. Hopefully, one of them will eventually > come around and make a stand. > > Linux O'Beardly > @LinuxOBeardly > http://o.beard.ly > linux.obear...@gmail.com > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Emiliano Marini < > emilianomarin...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Interesting article from Richard Stallman. >> >> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/applying-free-sw-criteria.html >> >> It starts with: >> >> *"For a software package to be free, all the code in it must be free. But >> not only the code. Since documentation files including manuals, README, >> change log, and so on are essential technical parts of a software package, >> they must be free as well."* >> >> And concludes with: >> >> *"As new situations arise, the GNU Project and the Free Software >> Foundation will adapt our freedom criteria so as to lead computer users >> towards freedom, in practice and in principle."* >> >> Maybe RSM has some concern about Red Hat, systemd and the new idea of >> "freedom of code vs. freedom of developers"? >> >> Cheers, >> Emiliano. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dng mailing list >> Dng@lists.dyne.org >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
