On 2015-08-31 05:34, Steve Litt wrote:
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 16:20:15 -0400
Clarke Sideroad <clarke.sider...@gmail.com> wrote:
It seems to me that with so much in common GNU/Linux or UNIX use that
was so deeply flawed, he/Redhat would have been further ahead to just
fork off and create Poettericks or or Poetterdows.
No, because in a head to head showdown where people could alternate
between Linux and PoetterGlom, in a year or two Linux would have won on
technical merits. They had to wreck Linux before they could proceed
with their plan.
I guess the problem with heading in that direction would have be the
lack of recognition, his project/operating system seems to have taken
advantage of a well established name, Linux and managed to Hijack a
large proportion of the userbase. a rather astute strategic and
political move when you look at it that way.
But ask, why does Redhat pay him for this. Redhat can't make money
consulting a simple OS that any admin can admin.
Follow the money.
SteveT
Steve Litt
August 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts
http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
It's the NSA. Redhat is unsurprising ... debian? ... they must have
spent years putting the right people in the right places ...
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
