On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Roger Leigh wrote: > >>I imagine the reason why Glib was written in C is because binding to > >>other languages is easier with C than C++. > >> > >I expect so. C is fairly straightforward. > > This was certainly the original intent. But having used the bindings, > my experience was that they were of wildly variable quality, had > varying degrees of wrapper coverage, and some were not exactly usable. > All in all, the number of production quality bindings could be counted > on one hand with some fingers to spare. Maybe it's improved since I > last looked.
I share most of the criticism to GTK in this thread. I think the best thing it really produced was glade/libglade, but then is it worthed? personally a fan of FLTK which I really recommend, worthed mentioning in this thread I guess. ciao _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
