On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 09:57:08PM -0700, James Powell wrote: > An LTS branch isn't needed if you do version controlled releases and sponsor > support for versioned releases for at least 3-4 versions back.
[cut] > > As releases mature, 1.0 would be maintained until the fourth or fifth release > year following, then pastured, regardless of version number. The only time > the main number should be changed is IF and ONLY IF glibc is updated, > otherwise 1.0 would transmigrate to 1.1. > > How does that sound? > It sounds like Slackware, and there is a clear reason why I have been using Debian and not Slackware. I believe that the stable-testing-unstable-experimental organisation is working already fine. We can discuss whether we have the possibility (and the resources) to provide long-time support releases, but if you guys want to make a Slackvuan, then don't count me in. HND KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
