Not exactly. Eudev is free of systemd, but it shares nearly 99.5% of it's code base with systemd-udev, plus some minor fix ups from the Gentoo developers.
It's name technically means Extracted udev. You get the same udev if you build the systemd-udev with an extraction kit as eudev, minus the fix ups. The only time eudev will become a true fork is when kdbus gets official, but no one is betting on it, nor holding our breath... yet. Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Hendrik Boom<mailto:hend...@topoi.pooq.com> Sent: 5/14/2015 3:13 PM To: dng@lists.dyne.org<mailto:dng@lists.dyne.org> Subject: Re: [Dng] A novice attempt to speed up Devuan development On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:15:50PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Thu, 2015-05-14 at 12:15 -0500, T.J. Duchene wrote: > > > I think the fact that I pointed out clearly shows that there is very good > > > technical reason to exclude udev, unless you are willing to be the > > > maintainer > > > of udev outside systemd source tree in Devuan. > > > > > The shortest and most reasonable route to release a stable 1.0 of > > Devuan is to use udev for the present. > > See below. > > > Eudev might make a good > > replacement, but udev is still the best candidate in terms of people > > using it if you follow the principle that "eyes make bugs shallow". > > People are working _now_ on eudev as a replacement for udev until vdev > is finished. It might even be a good replacement for udev already for > the devuan jessie release. What do you do, except chat? Isn't eudev actually the systemd-free fork of udev everyone is asking for? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
