On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:47:27AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > I'm under the impression you can do most or all of what needs to be > done in the actual init, rather than the initramfs. This gets a little > complicated now that Linux has been "improved" by having /sbin > and /bin be symlinks to /usr/bin, which might not be mounted in early > boot, but aside from that, I think once you have possession of /bin > and /sbin, then assuming that /etc is not a mountpoint, I think most > other stuff can be delayed til the real init, always assuming that it's > easier to put stuff in the on-disk init than in initramfs.
Is that Linux that has been "improved" by turning /sbin and /bin into symlinks? Or is it Debian? Or the systemd collection of distros? -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
