, > > > > You're soooo demotivating! Systemd was never a problem, it's > > wonderful, you're just a troll! Just go with the program and use it: > > This is the 21st century, so we need a 21st century init system. > > Systemd is modular, it's comprised of nothing but modules. I think Don > > Armstrong should kick you off of Debian-User. If you don't like > > Debian, make your own! > > > > Oh wait, you resigned, Don Armstrong can't fire you. Oh wait, you > > *are* making your own. > > > > :-) :-) :-) > > > > For all of you not familiar with Debian-User, my reply was a humorous > > parody of what happens on Debian-User every time somebody questions > > the devine wisdom of systemd. > > > > Congrats, Go Linux! > > > > SteveT > > [T.J. ] Are you guys just making jokes or are people really like that over at Debian User these days? I realize systemd is not everyone's favorite topic, but this seems "over the top" and exaggerated. You mentioned an Armstrong before. Is the trolling really that bad?
>From my standpoint, systemd is neither bad nor good, it is badly constructed. >I certainly would not put it on server without serious thought, but I do not >think that I would be overly concerned about it on the desktop. Steve, I'd like to ask you a question from a technical standpoint. I am not being sarcastic or condescending in any way whatsoever. If you, in your experience, think that perhaps systemd is an attempt to clone a Windows desktop, the server side of Linux be damned? I would think that myself, except that RedHat is paying Poettering. It seems to me that there are really two sides in this: the veteran UNIX server crowd and the FLOS Linux Desktop people? Thoughts anyone? _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
