On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 12:33:34PM +0100, Didier Kryn wrote: > > Le 28/03/2015 05:53, John Morris a écrit :
> >Trying to take the high moral ground and claim to be shooting for a > >stricter freedom is what leads to RMS and Debian unable to agree on > >which is the more 'Free.' Debian rejecting the FSF's GNU FDL and RMS > >rejecting the easy availability of the non-free repos, blobs, etc. and > >all of the eyerolling that entails amongst us normal folk outside the > >priesthood. > As I said, I won't fight for words. I don't know what moral has > to do here though. I know GNU does not consider Debian free... who > cares? The very strict FSF interpretation is a useful extreme -- much like the North Pole is for the idea of north, and absolute zero is for the idea of cold. Now north is useful n our compasses, and cold is great for beer (free or not), but few of us would want to spend our entire lives at absolute zero or the north pole. > >We haven't needed to run every user program in a hardened jail and a > >good argument can be made that the primary reason to do so is because > >you want to let in a lot of untrustworthy software that should be run in > >a secure container. See Android/Linux for what sort of dystopia the > >worst case scenario looks like. > BTW, I, like many others, find convenient to use e.g. Skype, and > I would prefer to run it inside a container. There's software I would definitely prefer to run in a container. There's software I would definitely like to run out of container. It would be nice to have a choice. That is what android does not provide. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
