Jaromil, >we struggle to have no systemd at all in Devuan, >In the alpha releases there is *no systemd daemon running*
Thanks for clearing that up! Linux O'Beardly @LinuxOBeardly http://o.beard.ly On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Jaromil <jaro...@dyne.org> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Nuno Magalhães wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:59 PM, Mark R. White <whit...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > Just to be clear: I've seen a lot of cross talk about the > > > possibility of systemd being put into Devuan via a sandbox or even > > > having the systemd API written in. Is it safe to assume that going > > > forward that there will be no systemd in Devuan? Because if there > > > is, I'm in the wrong place. > > > > +1 > > I am aware of the discussions, but I haven't followed them in detail > because of lack of time. > > I can only repeat what we always wrote: we struggle to have no systemd > at all in Devuan, with the implied advantages of better compatibility > with BSD userspace, possibility to keep around uclibc, Hurd etc. > > If we have Systemd in the alpha release cycle is just because of a few > desktop requirements and mostly the fact that udev now is incorporated > in systemd (that's why vdev is very important to us). > > In the alpha releases there is *no systemd daemon running* so this is a > first goal achieved. The systemd package is there and may stick around > for a while until vdev is in good shape. > > ciao > > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
