> > > I don't know. Given the entire NetworkManager's dependency on dbus, > > > > Dbus is just the mechanism other programs use to interact with NM. > > If you were to carve out the dbus API from NM, it would still manage > > your network as before, but you'd need to add a different way to > > control it. > > For me it would be easier to build something simple from scratch than > rip out and replace other peoples' code from something unfamiliar to me.
i think the implied message was that dbus is merely an IPC mechanism and removing would simply result in replacing it with another and thus a (mostly) moot point. --Gravis On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote: > On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:34:37 -0500 > Jude Nelson <jud...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I don't know. Given the entire NetworkManager's dependency on dbus, > > > > Dbus is just the mechanism other programs use to interact with NM. > > If you were to carve out the dbus API from NM, it would still manage > > your network as before, but you'd need to add a different way to > > control it. > > > > -Jude > > :-) > > For me it would be easier to build something simple from scratch than > rip out and replace other peoples' code from something unfamiliar to me. > > SteveT > > Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ > Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
