On Monday, 23 de February de 2015 23:39:19 Jude Nelson escribió: > > Why not? If I were a developer and I had a library or service doing part > > of my > > > work, I would link to it and delete duplicated code on my side. > > If logind could be run fully independently from systemd, I don't think > there would be as much of a controversy.
Not logind, but its inteface can (and that's what LoginKit is about). > > This is why I don't really buy the explanation that "we don't depend on > systemd; we just depend on something that implements systemd's interface" > as an excuse for depending on systemd. That's like Microsoft saying > "Silly Linux users, MS Word doesn't depend on Windows, it just depends on > something that implements the Win32 API and DirectX." While technically > true, it hides the fact that the degree to which they depend on the API is > so large that the "something that implements the API" must effectively be > re-implementation of the very thing we were trying to avoid using in the > first place. Please note that I'm not defending systemd. I just explai why KDE movement is logical. er Envite -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? OpenPGP key: 1586 50C8 7DBF B050 DE62 EA12 70B4 00F3 EEC7 C372 Spiral galaxies always have at least TWO arms.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
