On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:19:27AM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 20:32:28 -0500 > Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 06:41:06PM -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Feb 2015 10:36:19 -0600 > > > Vince Mulhollon <vi...@mulhollon.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There shouldn't be any "tweaking" for a desktop. This whole bad > > > > idea comes from marketing at Microsoft > > > > > > Whoaaa, wait a minute. Another word for "tweaking" is "choice", > > > kind of like the reason we revolted and overthrew Debian. > > > > I don't think he was talking about choosing and adjusting the desktop > > to suit you. I think he was talking about changing the underlying > > infrastructure so it inexorably leads the way to a desktop, making > > other desktops difficult, and making traaditional nondesktop awkward. > > You mean the new meme of having Gnome control Linux? If that's what he > meant, I'm with him 100%.
A bit more aggressive a statement, but yes, that's an example. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
