On 2 February 2015 at 13:02, Martijn Dekkers <devuan-li...@dekkers.org.uk> wrote:
> http://ma.ttias.be/whats-new-systemd-2015-edition/ > > tl;dr everything, including the kitchensink. > > Some of the listed stuff looks/sounds pretty cool, I just have serious > reservations of all this stuff belonging to one team. I find it very hard > to see how any kind of quality can be maintained when delivering so much > functionality in such a short time. > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng > > I was going to have a rude reply here until I read this at the bottom: a new secure boot implementation: this is a work-in-progress, to have more validation of the boot process that it hasn't been tampered with. It will integrate a new method of signing images and initrd's Apart from all the crap that we can tease with, why there are people who, rather than improving grub or lilo, waste their time writing a bootloader from scratch? Surely not for the benefit of oss. Just for their prides or they have too much spare time. Also for anyone, that couldn't bare to read to the end, journald (the most hated part even for systemd supporters) isn't optional now. -- aldemir
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
