On 03.01.2015 02:56, Hendrik Boom wrote: > Poerhaps we should also have a ./devuan/ directory. We'd use the > ./debian/ directiry if the ./devuan/ directory were missing, but it > just might make it easier to track changes in debian, and if debian > were ever to cooperate, it might occasionally be possible to have > common source packages.
NAK. That would make the whole build process and maintenance much more complicated, and I fail to see the actual benefit. Just having separate branches for individual distros (even distros), named by distname, IMHO is *much* easier to maintain. cu -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consulting +49-151-27565287 _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
