Added as an informative reference -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast
From: Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, March 4, 2025 1:25 AM To: Daniel K. <[email protected]> Cc: Brotman, Alex <[email protected]>; Gunter Van de Velde <[email protected]>; The IESG <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Re: Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-28: (with COMMENT) On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 10:03 PM Daniel K. <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> GV> idnit or clarification. Not sure what "RFC5322.From domain" wants to >> specify? Is this a typo or copy/paste glitch? > > Most in the email industry understand that to be from the "From" > specification from RFC5322, Section 3.6. If you'd like it to be made more > clear, I can try to do that. This syntax is detailed in RFC5598, that is referenced in dmarcbis, maybe we should put in a reference to that RFC in this draft as well? We pick up that reference transitively from the base document, but adding it directly is probably a good idea. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
