According to Mark Alley <mark.al...@tekmarc.com>: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >p=none is one solution, the other ( interoperable method) is to exempt the >traffic from whatever process is breaking DKIM (i.e. external subject/body >warning tags, URL rewriting, etc.). But that's a per-customer fix.
That would require getting the customer to understand that they're causing the problem and to spend money fixing it, rather than saying "your mail is broken." Good luck with that. Also remember that until DMARC came along, this all worked just fine. R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
