It appears that Emil Gustafsson <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >That's what I'm thinking too. I think the key here is that it is not easy >for a mailbox provider to know if the privacy aspect is addressed in the >contract with their customer or not. Nor if the PSO demands all their >customers to have their own DMARC or not. I think that is what it boils >down to.
The current draft says that PSDs can only ask for aggregate reports, and only get them for nonexistent domains, where nonexistent means the domain is NXDOMAIN. The policy applies to anything under the PSD that doesn't publish their own policy. If you think we should say something different, please say what you would like to change. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
