Thanks Scott. I'll try to get this merged in the next few days. I have two other merges from Ale that I need to sort out. I'll get a new rev done after they're both merged.
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast ________________________________________ From: dmarc <[email protected]> on behalf of Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 10:43 AM To: IETF DMARC WG Subject: [dmarc-ietf] PSD Related Privacy Considerations For Aggregate Reporting Draft The RFC 9091 privacy considerations, with minor updates need to be incorporated into the DMARCbis effort. Given the constraints on PSDs requesting failure reports, they belong in the aggregate draft. I've opened a PR to, with some light editing, pull them in: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/pull/15__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!E1ob9b6zOndeoRR8Tg7UMGAjqaq9Oo_z3eoYEByvsS-ttdsgNKpMMLcme9a-O1864chySx8TnYuf_EiF96H_$ I don't think it should be particularly controversial, since it's almost exactly what the WG already agreed for RFC 9091, but people should review it. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!E1ob9b6zOndeoRR8Tg7UMGAjqaq9Oo_z3eoYEByvsS-ttdsgNKpMMLcme9a-O1864chySx8TnYuf_IbBOtPw$ _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
