On October 30, 2022 10:14:18 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sat 29/Oct/2022 20:56:57 +0200 Douglas Foster wrote:
>> Host names, both HELO and RevDNS, are not random
>
>
>+1, possibly except for spam, helo names are meaningful.
>
>
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 1:41 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've always considered it to be a random string, because the protocol
>>> allows it to be such. It doesn't necessarily mean or correlate to
>>> anything as far as I can tell.
>
>
>The new protocol seems to be going to acknowledge that receivers may (and do)
>discard messages based on helo names.
It's still unrelated to DMARC. DMARC reports are not general purpose forensic
documents. They have a specific purpose. Both DKIM and SPF have specific
feedback report types for non-DMARC reporting. At most, I could see adding an
informative mention of the other report formats for other things.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
