Please post diffs to the list first. What we have now is the result of a lot of careful review by working group members and I don't think throwing it away in favor of unreviewed text is a good idea.
Scott K On October 18, 2022 2:45:29 PM UTC, Todd Herr <[email protected]> wrote: >Greetings. > >There are plans for a new revision of DMARCbis to be released soon, likely >this week, and that revision will incorporate at least some of the text and >ideas that Doug has proposed here. > >Watch this space... > >On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 7:19 PM Neil Anuskiewicz <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> There’s a small typo: A policy search is used to determine the applicable >> DMARC policy, and where applicble, the organizational domain to be used for >> relaxed alignment. >> >> Replace applicble with applicable. >> >> > On Oct 12, 2022, at 5:18 PM, Douglas Foster < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > A policy search is used to determine the applicable DMARC policy, and >> where applicble, the organizational domain to be used for relaxed alignment. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmarc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >> > > _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
