It appears that Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> said: >Unless you are something like .gov or .us.com you don't need to use psd=y. I >think this is likely to lead to confusion and mis-deployment. The only reason >to use psd=n is if the entity above yours in the DNS tree has a DMARC record >without psd=y and is an actual PSD. > >When we discussed this before, we concluded that while the current protocol >definition does technically support embedded PSDs lower in the tree below >DMARC >organization domains, it's not something that actually happens.
When I went through and looked at all of the domains in the OSL that have DMARC records, I found a few like uk.com which may send mail, but they certainly don't act as org records for their subdomains. There are only a handful of them and I think we know all the people that run them so to the extent they need psd=y, we can arrange for that. I agree with Scott that the proposed text doesn't belong in the draft. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
