It appears that Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> said: >>> No, it's not an accident. We designed the tree walk based on our knowledge >>> of the way people publish DMARC records.
>I don't understand this unwearying opposition irrespective of the >argument. If you do a tree walk NOW (which is why I said currently) >you have exactly 0 probability to determine an abnormal PSD, since the >tag hasn't been assigned yet. Indeed, and even so the tree walk gets the right answer nearly 100% of the time, right now. PSDs are rare, "abnormal" PSDs are even rarer. The PSD tag is in arcane nit. While I'm not opposed to the psd tags, I really wish people would get some perspective. The amount of mail they affect is tiny, the amount affected by uber-nits like whether a PSD can be an org domain is too small to waste so much time on. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
