On May 30, 2022 9:50:05 PM UTC, David Bustos <[email protected]> wrote:
>Since I own david.bustos.name, someone forwards [email protected] for me; I
>presume Verisign does.
>
>Lately I think email receivers have been quarantining my messages and I
>suspect the reason is SPF. Specifically, no SPF record is published for
>bustos.name . I asked Verisign to publish one and they declined.
>
>I'm thinking that SPF should be modified so that if a receiver finds no record
>and the domain ends with .name and the domain has two levels, it should look
>for the record on the third level domain. Does that make sense?
No. My provider won't X, so we should special case the protocol doesn't scale.
It may be that .name is special to you, but there are a virtually infinite
number of domains that are special to someone else.
Also, not really a DMARC question.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
