On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 9:49 AM Douglas Foster < [email protected]> wrote:
> I am happy to have the concept optimized. Your comments make sense to me. > > I just believe strongly that these documents teach implementers best > practices and that this particular document is the time and place to begin > teaching best practices around non-existent domains. > > It is swell that postfix is widely used and responds appropriately to > non-existent domains But clearly we have a lot of implementers who need > coaching. > I don't dispute that documenting best practices is a thing to do; I just think that it's a thing for emailcore to do, not dmarc. Consider this paragraph from the charter for emailcore <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/emailcore/about/>: The working group will also work on an Applicability Statement in parallel with 5321bis and 5322bis, to capture relationships to other documented and widely deployed work (recommended extensions, transport security and other issues from the UTA working group's output, and such) and current email practices. 5321bis and 5322bis will be submitted for publication before this document is finalized, and the "bis" documents will have priority for the working group's attention until they are finished. I don't see similar language in the charter for this group. -- *Todd Herr* | Sr. Technical Program Manager *e:* [email protected] *m:* 703.220.4153 This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s) authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to this email and then delete it from your system.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
