On 1/25/21 11:53 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
I don't know. That would need to be specified. To me it sounds like a good reason to not try to specify http especially if there doesn't seem to be any clear desire for it.On Sun 24/Jan/2021 19:49:34 +0100 Michael Thomas wrote:issue #99 needs to be addressed.Won't we put a DKIM-Signature: in the http: header?
Mike _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
