On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 9:32 AM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why is this controversial? Seriously. What is controversial about saying > that the a report should authenticate? The onus is on the people who say it > does not to lay out the case for why it's not a problem, not me. #98 has a > simple piece of text to remedy this. it's 2021. You don't use > unauthenticated data if you can possibly help it. > I'm not taking a position at this point on the issue, but I think you should expect that this will come up in external reviews. If consensus is to maintain the status quo, we might want to say so explicitly (and why) rather than saying nothing, as the latter might be interpreted as it having gotten no consideration at all. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
