Hello folks, Some time ago, an issue[1] was brought to the list where which DKIM(s) being reported is not clear in RFC7489 [2]. There was a short discussion, though no clear resolution before conversation trailed off. It seems like there were points that may need to be discussed. One was whether the reporting SHOULD report all signatures, regardless of alignment or validity, or perhaps just the one that aligns (if there is one). There was also another question if there should be a limit to the number of signatures reported so that it remains sane.
We'd like to try to get this resolved within about two weeks. Thank you for your feedback. 1: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9-V596yl2BBaUzCNaDZB1Tg1s4c/ 2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7489#section-7.2 -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
