On 12/9/20 6:12 PM, Brandon Long wrote: > At best, we considered allowing RUF reports for cases where the dmarc domain > was the receiver, ie if someone had a message that failed dmarc while sending > to the same domain, then presumably the domain admin already has the power to > view the message. > > But, if you limit it to that level, then the domain admin could already > theoretically do this themselves by having those messages delivered to some > destination to look at them, or setting > up their own forwarding rule to their dmarc analysts.
I agree with this. With senders that have a relatively large volume, there is a very high probability that at least one of the recipients is local. Most of the necessary information is probably already available in logs. Jesse _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
