In article <CAJ4XoYcue16VU6otKOzQBFy_59nD8DGcDQb8H=z0msx-xla...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >This is just wrong. While I appreciate the enthusiasm for using the Sender >field, unless there is a mechanism for establishing a relationship between >the From domain and the Sender domain then we have basically broken DMARC. >Using what has been described above, any malicious actor can bypass the >wishes of the From domain and send whatever they want.
Aw, come on. Surely you of all people know that DMARC aligned doesn't mean it's not spam. the whole reason we're here is that we have abundant evidence that at least where mailing lists are involved, the policy published in DMARC often doesn't express the actual wishes of the domain publishing it. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
