In article <[email protected]> you write: >> Why is adoption low? Is that a big problem? Why so few aggressive >> policies? Is that a big problem? > >DMARC can be quite useful even with p=none. This use case provides >insight on what's going on and sometimes, that's all that is wanted. >Moving to more aggressive policies require a degree of control on the >mail flows that not all organizations are prepared to exercise, IMO.
Quite right. My system publishes DMARC policies for over 100 domains, and they're all p=none execpt that four which don't send mail at all have p=reject. I collect and look at the reports which can be very interesting. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
