My wording was not careful enough. What I /meant/ was: end-users are
not relevant to the /trust-related decision making/ that is the goal
of these protection mechanisms.
This may be a philosophical theory, but in reality, in lieu of having
deterministic mechanisms, we do have mail systems who do allow the
user to make these type of trust decisions. If a trust-related
question is answered wrong by the user, the true victim is the honest
sender.
My comment was about observable behavior, not philosophical anything.
The issue isn't about was is available to users, but what they actually
do. Behavior.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
